Autter

For the people who own what ships.

Not for developers who want faster approvals. Autter is for the people accountable when something in production breaks.

The person who hires Autter is rarely the person writing the code. They are the person answering for what happens when that code reaches production.

Every feature decision at Autter is weighed through the lens of the person paying the invoice.

Four case files, one merge gate.

Different jobs, same accountability. Scroll through the files and watch the same gate work each desk.

The engineering lead

What keeps them up

  • 40 open PRs and no reliable signal on which three need real attention.
  • AI-generated code is flooding a review queue built for human output.
  • The postmortem is always the first time you hear about the vulnerability.

How Autter helps

  • Every PR gets a risk verdict before any human opens the diff. Low risk clears. Critical blocks the merge button.
  • Risk accumulation is visible across every repository in real time. Not a feeling. Numbers.

autter / PR #247 · api/users/search.ts

risk_level
CRITICAL
blast_radius
14 files affected
finding
SQL injection, unsanitised input reaches the query
author_risk
MEDIUM, 2 recent CVEs from this author

Merge blocked

The open source maintainer

What keeps them up

  • Most incoming PRs are AI-generated boilerplate that eats review hours you do not have.
  • A vulnerable dependency merged quietly. A researcher filed the report six months later.
  • No way to tell the reliable contributors from the ones generating noise.

How Autter helps

  • AI-generated PRs are flagged and categorised before they reach your review queue.
  • Contributor intelligence builds a quality profile over time, so you know whose PRs need scrutiny and whose can clear.

autter / PR #1,203 · lib/auth/session.ts

ai_slop
DETECTED, hallucinated import of a package that does not exist
contributor
4 of the last 5 PRs flagged for quality issues
dependency
CVE-2024-3094, severity CRITICAL

Merge blocked

The security engineer

What keeps them up

  • Scanning happens post-deployment, when remediation costs ten times as much.
  • SOC 2 and ISO 27001 evidence is assembled by hand from three different systems.
  • Developers do not run security tools on their own. Adoption is near zero without a gate.

How Autter helps

  • Security checks run on every PR with zero change to how developers work.
  • Per-PR reports arrive formatted for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and enterprise procurement reviews.

autter / PR #89 · app/controllers/payments.rb

taint_analysis
VULNERABLE
finding
unsanitised user input reaches the database query
owasp
A03:2021 Injection
audit_log
recorded, exportable PDF available

Merge blocked

The startup CTO shipping at speed

What keeps them up

  • Cursor, Claude Code, and Lovable all at once, with no picture of the combined output.
  • Review is a bottleneck nobody wants, and skipping it is a known risk. You are stuck between both.
  • You will not know there is a problem until a customer finds it.

How Autter helps

  • Analysis completes in under 10 seconds on changed files. No friction, so nobody routes around it.
  • Catches the dangerous three, clears the safe 37. You stop betting and start knowing.

autter / PR #34 · src/api/checkout.ts

blast_radius
MEDIUM, 6 files affected
ai_slop
CLEAN
security
PASS, no vulnerabilities detected
behavior
PASS, no regressions against the base branch

Merge approved

Some people should not hire Autter.

  • Developers shopping for a personal productivity tool.
  • Teams whose biggest pain is style and formatting.
  • Anyone who wants a bot that comments and steps aside.

Autter blocks merges. It was built for the person who has to answer for what got through, not the person who submitted it.

Calm seas ahead

Your harbour, your rules.

Autter installs as a GitHub App in under two minutes. No credit card required.

Hire AutterTalk to the founders